Lots of pictures are hand made reproductions, which alsways entail some intrepretation from the artist (reseracher) who made them.
-- G. Anderson, "Bushman Rock Art, South Africa", Art Publishers Ltd, Durban, Johanesburg, Cape Town
The person is Dr Gavin Anderson, a colleague I have corresponded with before and who I caught up with at the June 2006 SAfA conference. His speciality is Iron Age southern Africa.
Thanks Mikey,
In fact my comment was in regard of the book quoted above... Sorry, it is my post that was misleadingly presented. The book by Denis Lewis Williams was the one on which I was commenting. I observed that too many of the illustrations in his book were hand made reproductions, not photographic pictures and as such biased by the observer's interpretation.
This is a comment that can be generalized... For example, I had seen several pictures of the Sorcerer in the "Grotte Trois Frères" and I had read the comments about that hybrid creature representation. I was quite surprised when I came accross the same picture but as a photographic reproduction rather than a hand made drawing. It was quite different from the original. Here is a
drawing of the "sorcerer" and here is a
photographic picture of the "sorcerer"In fact, even photographic pictures can be misleading. Last summer I visites the préhistoric park "Le Thot" near Montignac where Lascaux II is installed. There is a beautiful three D reprduction of the "Well Scene" from Lascaux which isn't in Lascaux II. I had seen hand made pictures, photographic images, but none could convey the sense of depth and the use of the cave walls shapes in that representation.
With regard to the book on the San's Art, it is indeed beutiful. Since you are in contact with Dr Gavin Anderson, do you know if he had published some other books on he art of the Sans? The small book that I presented is beautiful but not very detailed nor giving much information on the dates and styles.
Thanks.
Paul