Palanth Forum
May 22, 2012, 01:11:14 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: News from the Walker MN (pre-Clovis?) site  (Read 1447 times)
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« on: February 15, 2007, 04:54:37 PM »

To all,

A little late with this, but there was a news story from the city of Walker, Minnesota  that broke last month, announcing a possible 13,000-15,000 year old archaeological site discovered in 2005 while conducting a required archaeological survey prior to beginning construction of the Walker Area Community Center.   Visiting scientists (as far as I can tell, these are mostly State of Minnesota archaeologists and geologists) seem to agree the stone artifacts, although crude, are genuine, but the dating has some uncertainties.

A news report dated January 24th, 2007, from the Walker Pilot-Independent, by reporter Molly MacGregor, has a good introduction to the circumstances of the discovery.
HERE

The same day, this news report drew some comment from Palanth member Greg Laden, on his weblog HERE.  Greg expresses concern about "the crappy industry. Sort of like the Eolithic."   While perusing this entry, I clicked on the hyperlink to a previous weblog entry, dated January 19, 2007, HERE, which has some interesting background on the City of Walker, and some Laden family reminiscences, but has an interesting photograph of one of the purported artifacts (although the link to the Minneapolis Star-Tribune story no longer works) and more caution from Greg about acceptance of these purported stone tools..  In any case, if this photo really is one of the 'artifacts' from the proposed 13,000-15,000 year old Walker archaeological site, it is the first I've seen published.

Finally, a story dated February 14, 2007  from the Walker Pilot-Independent, by staff writer Gail DeBoer
HERE provides a follow-up and more interesting tidbits about the discovery, news of a report  given February 9-10 to a state conference of archaeologists (although no details of this are given), and that "the press aspect"  will halt while "initial findings will be distributed to national and international experts through professional channels" including "peer review. "

As all reports are very preliminary, not much can be said about the pre-Clovis prospects of the Walker site, but it is a promising story to be aware of.

Dar
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
Charlie Hatchett
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 101



« Reply #1 on: June 04, 2007, 01:55:19 AM »

Walker "Artifact" images:

http://media.startribune.com/smedia/2007/01/11/22/39-1oldest.standalone.prod_affiliate.2.jpg

http://media.startribune.com/smedia/2007/01/11/22/699-2oldest0112.standalone.prod_affiliate.2.jpg

http://www.kare11.com/assetpool/images/07112184324_tools-combined-hd.jpg
Logged

Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2007, 08:17:59 AM »


Dear Charlie,

Thanks for the links to the pictures. Definitely better than what I have seen so far.

Except for what has be mentioned earlier by Dar (with a link to Greg Laden's site), nothing new has been reported on this purported pre-Clovis site. From my point of view, the first object you have brought up might be an artefact, but I would certainly not put too much money on the others. To use Greg’s word, they do look like “eoliths” to me, and, believe me, the world (of archaeology) is replete with such things. So, unless something new comes up, I think we should stick with Dar’s earlier assessment and shelve this story for a while.

Jacques
Logged
Charlie Hatchett
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 101



« Reply #3 on: June 06, 2007, 05:51:02 AM »

Agreed.

Respectfully,

Charlie
Logged

Charlie Hatchett
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 101



« Reply #4 on: November 17, 2007, 09:15:40 AM »

"...While sifting soil through a screen, Burnette spotted "the find" of the season: a tiny, unique tool now called the "Burnette Micro-Tool."

The triangular artifact made of agate is no bigger than a person's little fingernail. Olmanson says the tool has been bifacially worked all the way around and exhibits "basal thinning," where a broad flake has been taken off each side of the base to allow the tool to be "hafted" or affixed onto a handle. This, he explains, is suggestive of Paleoindian (12,000 to 8,500 BP) fluting technologies. Similarly shaped but larger tools were common in the Woodland period (about 1,200 to 250 BP). A tool this small would have been used for detail work..."

http://www.walkermn.com/pilot/?sect_rank=1&section_id=75&story_id=235622

Walker specimens:

http://www.phpbb88.com/nohandaxesinus/viewtopic.php?t=89&mforum=nohandaxesinus



Logged

Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!