Palanth Forum
May 22, 2012, 01:40:43 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: The geographical origins of the ancestral "moderns": Africa vs. China vs. India?  (Read 1010 times)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« on: June 07, 2007, 08:40:09 PM »

All,

While I am certainly not in a position to wax eloquent about the Narmada finds, I am sure (I hope) some of the Forum members will have something to say about the following which I have just picked up this morning:

Quote
Did early man originate in India?

30 May, 2007

NAGPUR: It may provide new clues to the history of mankind. A recent discovery by a city scientist working for the Anthropological Survey of India (ASI) has strengthened the theory that the early man could have originated in India. It also hints at the possibility that central India might have been the hotbed of human evolution.

Dr Pradyut Gangopadhyay, working for ASI's local office, has discovered a part of femur (thigh bone) near Hathlora village in Hoshangabad district of Madhya Pradesh, a part of Narmada valley. Though not dated through scientific means, scientists surmise the bone fossil is not less than 50,000 years old, which can be that of homo erectus, the ancestor of the modern man.

This is the third major discovery of human remains from the same place, which is termed as middle to later paleosicte stratum and relates to remains at least as old as 50,000 years.

Click HERE for the full text.

Jacques
Logged
lagarvelho
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 354



« Reply #1 on: June 08, 2007, 06:00:03 PM »

Jacques and all:

Having now read the full article, I don't think these finds exactly prove that "modern" humans originated in India.  I'm sure that the discoverer would *like* this to be the case, but I don't think he can prove it.  If these finds are 50 kyr old, and "modern" humans supposedly originated in Africa 150 kyr ago, there would have been plenty of time to get there.  What it *may* suggest is, that once people left Africa, they managed to get around pretty fast.  Oh, and that probably went for H.erectus, too.
Anne G
Logged
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #2 on: June 17, 2007, 08:13:38 PM »

Jacques and all:

Having now read the full article, I don't think these finds exactly prove that "modern" humans originated in India.  I'm sure that the discoverer would *like* this to be the case, but I don't think he can prove it.  If these finds are 50 kyr old, and "modern" humans supposedly originated in Africa 150 kyr ago, there would have been plenty of time to get there.  What it *may* suggest is, that once people left Africa, they managed to get around pretty fast.  Oh, and that probably went for H.erectus, too.
Anne G

Anne,

My posting of this bit of info from India was somewhat "tongue-in-cheek. Too subtle for the internet, perhaps! I'll let you guess what it was all about.

Jacques
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!