PS It would be nice if someone -- Ellery Frahm, perhaps -- could explain to me what is the difference between "archaeological geology" and "geoarchaeology".
Someone said my name?
Geoarchaeology, as I and some others define it, is the application of geological theories, approaches, and techniques to address archaeological research questions, particularly when incorporated into the initial research design. Having a soil and sediment specialist on an archaeological site during the excavations to aid in interpretation would be an example of geoarchaeology.
Archaeological geology, again as I and some others define it, refers to using geological data, collected previously and independently, to address archaeological research questions. An example would be, say, using geoscience research on ancient shorelines to, some time later, go out and look for archaeological sites.
I should acknowledge that there are (of course) different opinions about these definitions and what exactly differentiates geoarchaeology and archaeological geology, if anything at all in reality. Also there clearly can be studies which involve both of the research paradigms described here.
Some people ask, "Okay, Ellery, which do you do?" Because sourcing obsidian and native copper relies on both approaches and doesn't involve soils or sediments, I like to use the term "petroarchaeology" to describe what I do. And, of course, I have a link for that too...
http://web.mac.com/elleryfrahm/iWeb/Petroarchaeology/Petroarchaeology.htmlBest,
Ellery