Palanth Forum
May 22, 2012, 02:46:35 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: The Peopling of the World  (Read 1460 times)
Marc Washington
Palanth Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« on: March 22, 2008, 02:02:05 AM »

.

The following are not dogmatic positions; I am open to reason.

I use the word “Africans” for those usually (not always) with (color aside) heads longer than round (useful when referring to archeological evidence on web page below) “full” facial features, and hair typically wiry or woolly. With this definition, by phenotype, Nelson Mandela, Bob Marley, Obama, and Ophra are African but the British or Chinese Prime Minister and most South East Asians are not. Large populations around the world can be identified with this definition.

In treating the history of Europe from the establishment of European nations, the history of Europe prior to that point is, for the most part, ignored. It was the Great Migrations that brought the Germanic peoples into Europe from 500 AD to 1500 AD during the Middle Ages. But, prior to this time, the archeological record leaves evidence of Europe being the dwelling place of Africans.

A convenient way to understand the peopling of the modern world is that if the Great Migrations are looked at as phase one resulting in the ancestors of today’s Europeans arriving in their present countries; then phase two of migrations are from Europe to other world destinations: the Far East, the South Pacific, South Africa and elsewhere on that continent, and North and South America including Alaska and Canada.



http://www.beforebc.de/all_africa/04-10a-00-02.html

There is evidence (as mentioned earlier) that religion and writing were gained from the west by Africans so there was a peopling of the world and an enrichment of it:



http://www.beforebc.de/all_europe/02-16-500-00-07.html


Marc Washington


.

Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2008, 04:16:42 AM »

.

The following are not dogmatic positions; I am open to reason.

I use the word “Africans” for those usually (not always) with (color aside) heads longer than round (useful when referring to archeological evidence on web page below) “full” facial features, and hair typically wiry or woolly.

I am an African. White Zimbabweans are Africans. Afrikaaners are Africans. A lot of African-Americans are not culturally part of any society on the African continent. "African" is a cultural and a geological construct, *not* a biological construct as you define us to be.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Marc Washington
Palanth Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2008, 04:53:50 AM »

.
.

Hi Mikey. I accept your right to hold the view you do but by the same token have a right to define things as I see them. If a definition describes some reality, there must be some integrity to it - and such, I'd say, it is with my definition of the word "African"; one definition among others; as your own.

A given word, in any case, often has many different definitions in the dictionary. Even the two-letter preposition "to" has over a dozen meanings and three times that number cases in Websters.

Two definitions for the word "African" isn't an affront but clarification.

Respectfully,


Marc W.

.
.

Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2008, 05:34:43 AM »

Marc, I do not accept that sort of relativism which also denies the right of some Saharan inhabitants to define themselves as African.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Marc Washington
Palanth Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2008, 08:19:48 AM »

.
.

Mikey. I respect your right to hold the opinion you do.


Marc

.
.
Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2008, 12:54:45 PM »

.
.

Mikey. I respect your right to hold the opinion you do.


Marc

.
.



It is more than an "opinion". It is a anthropological, palaeoanthropological and antomical reality. Reducing such facts to the realm of an "opinion" introduces a degree of relativism that is both unrealistic and unscientific.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!