Marc, I have a couple of comments regarding your last post. Keeping in mind that I study variation in modern humans rather than the evolution of humans, I hope the group will forgive me if I've got this hopelessly wrong:
What do you understand the writers of the following articles to have said that in your opinion I have gotten wrong and that you have stated correctly:
(1) Bernard Wood, Human evolution: Ecce Homo - behold mankind, Nature 390:6656, Issue of 13 November 1997; (2) Ann Gibbons, Y chromosome shows that Adam was an African, Science, 278:5339, pp. 804 - 805, Issue of 31 Oct 1997; (3) Ornella Semino, A. Silvana Santachiara-Benerecetti, Francesco Falaschi, L. Luca Cavalli-Sforza, and Peter A. Underhill, Ethiopians and Khoisan Share the Deepest Clades of the Human Y-Chromosome Phylogeny, Am. J. Hum. Genet., 70:265-268, 2002.
It is my understanding that at least the second and third papers you cite are dealing with intraspecific rather than interspecific genetic variation, thus are making no inferences about differences in relatedness between any anatomically modern human populations and chimps.
In the above quote, we have the Bushman who, like the basal Egyptian, is straddling the borderline of human society at the time when he is leaving the domain of the pre-human and the pre-religious era.
I don't see how a modern human population could be said to be "leaving the domain of the pre-human". Any human-prehuman border was passed hundreds of thousands of years ago.