Palanth Forum
May 23, 2012, 12:23:25 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Dating Border Cave 5?  (Read 1712 times)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« on: April 15, 2003, 04:03:12 PM »

All,

Here is something I forgot to mention earlier – I think! Worth taking into account, given the importance of Border Cave in the ongoing discourse regarding the early presence of so-called “modern man” in South Africa. Also interesting, to the extent that the authors state, unequivocally, that, with appropriate samples and the use of what is called the “ABOX-SC technique”, they can get very close to the limits of what C14 can tell us about the age of things.

If you do not have access to the primary literature, and if you want to know more about the “ABOX-SC technique” and how reliable it might be, try an “ABOX-SC” Google search. And, perhaps, with luck some Radiocarbon aficionado will feel compelled to convincingly tell us all about it!

Jacques Cinq-Mars

Quote

Bird, M. I. (a), L. K. Fifield (b), G. M. Santos (b), P. B. Beaumont (c), Y. Zhou (a), M. L. di Tada (b) and P. A. Hausladen (b). 2003. Radiocarbon dating from 40 to 60 ka BP at Border Cave, South Africa. Quaternary Science Reviews 22(8-9): 943-947.

a Research School of Earth Sciences and Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia
b Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T. 0200, Australia
c McGregor Museum, Kimberley, South Africa

Abstract:

We present 21 radiocarbon dates on 19 charcoal samples from the sedimentary sequence preserved in Border Cave, South Africa. The background radiocarbon activity for charcoal from the cave was determined to be 0.050±0.018 percent modern carbon, from the analysis of a radiocarbon-dead sample from unit 5WA. Radiocarbon ages for individual samples ranged from 25.2 to >58.2 ka BP.

The error-weighted mean ages for successively older strata are 38.5+0.85/-0.95 ka BP for unit 1WA, 50.2+1.1/-1.0 ka BP for units 2BS.LR.A and 2BS.LR.B, 56.5+2.7/-2.0 ka BP for unit 2BS.LR.C and 59.2+3.4/-2.4 ka BP for unit 2WA. This radiocarbon chronology is consistent with independent chronologies derived from electron spin resonance and amino acid racemization dating. The results therefore provide further evidence that radiocarbon dating of charcoal by the ABOX-SC technique can yield reliable radiocarbon ages beyond 40 ka BP. They also imply that Border Cave 5, a modern human mandible, predates >58.2 ka BP and that the Middle Stone Age (Mode 3)––Later Stone Age (Mode 5) transition of Border Cave was largely effected between ~56.5 and ~41.6 ka ago.

Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.


Logged
jfxoc
Palanth Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 3



« Reply #1 on: April 18, 2003, 12:39:02 PM »

Key sources on ABOX-SC:

Bird M et al. (1999). Radiocarbon dating of 'old' charcoal using a wet-oxidation-stepped combustion procedure. Radiocarbon 41, 127-140.

[Describes the basic methodology]

Turney C et al. (2001). Early human occupation at Devil's Lair, southwestern Australia 50,000 years ago. Quaternary Research 55, 3-13.

[An early example of its application.  Dating of archaeological materials to 45 ka BP (uncalibrated) looks good.  Dates to 50 ka open to challenge on taphonomic grounds - question is whether the archaeological materials dated are in primary context.]

jim o'connell
Logged
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #2 on: October 28, 2003, 07:33:52 AM »

All,

Here is what appears to be a positive addition to the question(s) regarding the age of the Border Cave 5 mandible.

Jacques Cinq-Mars


Quote
Grün, Rainer, Peter Beaumont, Phillip V. Tobias, and Stephen Eggins. 2003. On the age of Border Cave 5 human mandible. Journal of Human Evolution 45(2): 155-167.

Abstract:

An enamel fragment from the Border Cave 5 specimen was analysed with non-destructive ESR combined with laser ablation ICP-MS for uranium profiling. We obtained an age of 74±5 ka which fits exactly into the chronological framework that has been previously established for Border Cave by a variety of dating techniques. The result lays at rest the view that BC5 could be of Iron Age, as was implied by (Journal of Human Evolution, 31 (1996) 499) based on nitrogen contents and infra-red splitting factors.

Copyright © 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.


Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!