Palanth Forum
May 23, 2012, 01:52:22 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Steinheim brain tumour  (Read 1752 times)
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« on: August 12, 2003, 09:35:06 AM »

[Link]

Does anyone know which journal this has been published in or will be ? Or indeed anything regarding its validity ?
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #1 on: August 13, 2003, 08:28:05 AM »

http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_808222.html?menu=news.quirkies

Does anyone know which journal this has been published in or will be ? Or indeed anything regarding its validity ?

This may be it.

Jacques Cinq-Mars

Quote
Prossinger, Hermann, Horst Seidler, Lothar Wicke, Dave Weaver, Wolfgang Recheis, Chris Stringer, and Gerd B. Müller. 2003. Electronic removal of encrustations inside the Steinheim cranium reveals paranasal sinus features and deformations, and provides a revised endocranial volume estimate. Anatomical Record 273B:132-142.

Abstract:
Features in the endocranium, as revealed by computed tomography (CT) scans of largely complete mid-Pleistocene crania, have helped elucidate unexpected affinities in the genus Homo. Because of its extensive encrustations and deformations, it has been difficult to repeat such analyses with the Steinheim cranium. Here, we present several advances in the analysis of this Homo heidelbergensis cranium by applying filter algorithms and image editing techniques to its CT scan. First, we show how the encrustations have been removed electronically, revealing interesting peculiarities, particularly the many directions of the deformations. Second, we point out similarities and differences between the frontal and sphenoidal sinuses of the Steinheim, Petralona, and Broken Hill (Kabwe) crania. Third, we assess the extent of the endocranial deformations and, fourth, their implications for our estimation of the braincase volume.


Keywords:
Steinheim, computed tomography, CT, imaging, fossil, encrustation, endocranial volume, endocast, Homo heidelbergensis

Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #2 on: August 13, 2003, 10:02:44 AM »

Quote
Abstract:
Features in the endocranium, as revealed by computed tomography (CT) scans of largely complete mid-Pleistocene crania, have helped elucidate unexpected affinities in the genus Homo. Because of its extensive encrustations and deformations, it has been difficult to repeat such analyses with the Steinheim cranium. Here, we present several advances in the analysis of this Homo heidelbergensis cranium by applying filter algorithms and image editing techniques to its CT scan. First, we show how the encrustations have been removed electronically, revealing interesting peculiarities, particularly the many directions of the deformations. Second, we point out similarities and differences between the frontal and sphenoidal sinuses of the Steinheim, Petralona, and Broken Hill (Kabwe) crania. Third, we assess the extent of the endocranial deformations and, fourth, their implications for our estimation of the braincase volume.

You're right; this is the likely source of the newspaper article and, naturally, sheds a, er, different light on how the research was actually conducted and the target questions.

On an offtopic matter, I must thank you for making this forum browser interoperable as I note that Microsoft will cease providing updated, downloadable, standalone releases of Internet Explorer.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Petya
Palanth Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 4



« Reply #3 on: August 13, 2003, 10:34:07 AM »

I think the correct source for Steinheim, including different researchers would be:
"Brain tumour in skeleton" at News 24
[Click Here]
with the following information:
Germany - Scientists have discovered rare evidence of a brain tumour in a fossilised skull dating back to the Stone Age, a German university said on Monday.
Based on measurements of the 365 000-year-old early human skull excavated at Steinheim an der Murr in southwestern Germany, three scientists concluded it is a rare example of a meningioma tumour, the University of Tuebingen said in a statement.
Alfred Czarnetzki, Carsten M Pusch and Erwin Schwaderer inspected the skull by macroscopy, endoscopy, three-dimensional CT scan and radiography and found a lump-sized formation in the bone that they say supports their theory.
 Because skulls of Stone Age people were smaller than human skulls today, the researchers believe the person may have suffered chronic severe headaches and partial paralysis, and likely died from the tumour.

So, apparently there are more than a few people working on this
Regards, Peter Tarr (Petya)
Logged
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #4 on: August 13, 2003, 11:11:51 AM »

Quote
Abstract:
Features in the endocranium, as revealed by computed tomography (CT) scans of largely complete mid-Pleistocene crania, have helped elucidate unexpected affinities in the genus Homo. Because of its extensive encrustations and deformations, it has been difficult to repeat such analyses with the Steinheim cranium. Here, we present several advances in the analysis of this Homo heidelbergensis cranium by applying filter algorithms and image editing techniques to its CT scan. First, we show how the encrustations have been removed electronically, revealing interesting peculiarities, particularly the many directions of the deformations. Second, we point out similarities and differences between the frontal and sphenoidal sinuses of the Steinheim, Petralona, and Broken Hill (Kabwe) crania. Third, we assess the extent of the endocranial deformations and, fourth, their implications for our estimation of the braincase volume.

You're right; this is the likely source of the newspaper article and, naturally, sheds a, er, different light on how the research was actually conducted and the target questions.

On an offtopic matter, I must thank you for making this forum browser interoperable as I note that Microsoft will cease providing updated, downloadable, standalone releases of Internet Explorer.

You are certainly welcome. On both counts. With regards to the latter (i.e., the Forum being 'interoperable'), there are still a few programming bugs that are bugging me, but I think we are getting there. The next step is to get contributions from members!

Jacques
Logged
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #5 on: August 13, 2003, 11:41:56 AM »

I think the correct source for Steinheim, including different researchers would be:
"Brain tumour in skeleton" at News 24
http://www.news24.com/News24/Technology/News/0,,2-13-14431400613,00.html
with the following information:
Germany - Scientists have discovered rare evidence of a brain tumour in a fossilised skull dating back to the Stone Age, a German university said on Monday.
Based on measurements of the 365 000-year-old early human skull excavated at Steinheim an der Murr in southwestern Germany, three scientists concluded it is a rare example of a meningioma tumour, the University of Tuebingen said in a statement.
Alfred Czarnetzki, Carsten M Pusch and Erwin Schwaderer inspected the skull by macroscopy, endoscopy, three-dimensional CT scan and radiography and found a lump-sized formation in the bone that they say supports their theory.
 Because skulls of Stone Age people were smaller than human skulls today, the researchers believe the person may have suffered chronic severe headaches and partial paralysis, and likely died from the tumour.

So, apparently there are more than a few people working on this
Regards, Peter Tarr (Petya)

Dear Peter Tarr,

Thanks for this additional info, but I seem to have problems getting access to the actual source (an excessively long URL) you have posted. One simple way to go around this (long URLs) is to make use of a 'short URL' command.

Here is one that is compatible with the program we use:

(url=)(b)CLICK HERE(/b)(/url)

Before saving it and making use of it -- hopefully, over and over again,  just make sure that the  (...) are turned into [...] and then, all you'll have to do is to insert the URL of your choice after the "=". It does work.

Jacques Cinq-Mars
Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #6 on: August 13, 2003, 01:04:02 PM »

Quote
You are certainly welcome. On both counts. With regards to the latter (i.e., the Forum being 'interoperable'), there are still a few programming bugs that are bugging me,

Good luck sorting them out. It's been an impatient wait for the journal and I guess that is one of the reasons why there has been a lack of posting activity here.

Another reason, I think, is one I mentioned a long time ago. I receive notification of replies to my messages, but wouldn't it be nice if (in addition to the link provided in the e-mail) the text of the reply is also provided. The bandwidth would be minimal and enable people to save the messages on their hard drives too.

Quote
but I think we are getting there. The next step is to get contributions from members!

Say, I'm getting the hang of this quote feature, with being so used to ">". I like it.

I'm starting my MA in Archaeology at University College London in a month's time. The three courses I'll be doing are: the Core course (theory), Issues in African Archaeology and an Ancient Egyptian archaeology course. The first two are relevant to this forum and I would much appreciate it if I could post on various aspects of those two courses during the course of the coming year to illicite additional feedback and discuss various views & ideas I may have.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2003, 01:11:07 PM »

[quote
So, apparently there are more than a few people working on this
Regards, Peter Tarr (Petya)
Quote

Thank you for this extra information. It would appear, on a hazardous guess, that there is either one large team working on various aspects regarding the skull or there could be two teams working at independent times. There is only one way to get to the bottom, as to me I'd like to know which is the actual report so I can get my hands on it. I'll e-mail Chris Stringer and report back when I have an answer.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2003, 09:30:03 PM »

This is further to my earlier note. In a rush to deal with something else, I didn't have time to complete my response. Apologies.


Say, I'm getting the hang of this quote feature, with being so used to ">". I like it.

Me too.

Quote
I'm starting my MA in Archaeology at University College London in a month's time. The three courses I'll be doing are: the Core course (theory), Issues in African Archaeology and an Ancient Egyptian archaeology course. The first two are relevant to this forum and I would much appreciate it if I could post on various aspects of those two courses during the course of the coming year to illicite additional feedback and discuss various views & ideas I may have.

Well, good luck with your university studies, and you  are certainly welcome to share some of the results of your work with all participants. Needless to say, whatever you will want to say about Egypt will have to predate 10,000 BP!

Jacques


Logged
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« Reply #9 on: August 15, 2003, 02:24:48 AM »

Actually, the reference for the "brain tumour" is a very short piece in The Lancet:

Czarnetzki, Alfred, Erwin Schwaderer & Carsten M. Pusch (2003). Correspondence: Fossil record of meningioma. THE LANCET. vol. 362., p. 408.

I waited a day to post this, since I found a pdf of it in Anne Gilbert's palanthsci forum files, and I thought she would mention it.  However.....

Cheers,
Dar  
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #10 on: August 15, 2003, 01:25:54 PM »

Actually, the reference for the "brain tumour" is a very short piece in The Lancet:

Czarnetzki, Alfred, Erwin Schwaderer & Carsten M. Pusch (2003). Correspondence: Fossil record of meningioma. THE LANCET. vol. 362., p. 408.

I waited a day to post this, since I found a pdf of it in Anne Gilbert's palanthsci forum files, and I thought she would mention it.  However.....

Cheers,
Dar  


My reply from Professor Stringer confirms what you've said, Dar, and it also confirms that there were two separate teams conducting CAT scans on the cranium. Professor Stringer's reply is given below.

----------------

Mikey, Apparently the Czarnetzki study was published in the latest issue of The Lancet - someone else forwarded me this copy, so I guess it is available online...Best Chris

Sir--Pathological examination of old samples can contribute important information as to the cause and history of certain diseases.1,2 However, since most palaeopathological research is based on a few skeletal remains, identification of soft-tissue cancers is rare. Here, we describe the fossil of Homo steinheimensis in which several features of the inner cranial table are consistent with a diagnosis of meningioma.

Meningiomas are, in general, slowly growing benign tumours derived from the arachnoidal cap cells of the leptomeninges. They are believed to be the most common primary tumour of the CNS. The skull we investigated was excavated at Steinheim/Murr (Baden-Württemberg, Germany) and consists of a well preserved plagiocephalic cranium, with most of the facial skeleton intact (figure). Results of stratigraphical dating suggest the specimen is about 365 000 years old.3,4 We inspected the cranium by macroscopy, endoscopy, three-dimensional CT, and radiography



Reconstruction of the intravital situation in lateral view of a median section. Sphenoparietal sinus (1), two widened branches of the middle meningeal artery (2). At the bottom of the figure is a CT section through the meningioma region, indicating the thinning of parietal bone. The dashed line indicates the curvature of a normal skull.


On the righthand side, the inner skull table had an indentation in the parietal bone 12·5 mm posterior to the coronal, and 2·3 mm lateral to the sagittal suture. Its anteroposterior width was 36·7 mm and its mediolateral extent 26·7 mm. It involved the parietal bone up to the layer of the outer table at a maximum depth of 6·2 mm (figure). The surface within this depressed area was smooth and regular. We did not notice such impressions in a large comparative sample (n>7000) of ancient and modern skulls. Furthermore, an enlarged sulcus of the anterior ramus of the middle meningeal artery is superimposed on a widened sulcus of the sphenoparietal sinus. In a comprehensive clinical study done in 2002,5 all the above features were noted in about 70% of cases, emphasising their pathognomonic character for parasagittal meningiomas. The tumour's likely cross section dimension anteroposterior was about 51 mm, mediolateral 43 mm, and it had a depth of about 25 mm. The volume was 29 mL. Such tumour size is largely equivalent to the average meningioma diagnosed today (about 30 mL).5 In view of the demanding Pleistocene living conditions, this tumour size in conjunction with the small Steinheim cerebrum of only 1100-1200 mL (modern brain: 1300-1800 mL), might have caused continual headache, severe hemiparesis, and finally death.

Meningiomas have an annual age-adjusted incidence of two to nine per 100 000. For comparison, the Middle Pleistocene population size of hunters and gatherers has been estimated at 25-30 community members with an effective ancient population size of only 10 000 individuals. Such low values emphasise the rarity of fossil meningiomas. We thank R Czarnetzki, who helped with data management and processing of the figures, and the Stuttgart State Museum of Natural History, for providing access to the Steinheim skull. Alfred Czarnetzki, Erwin Schwaderer, *Carsten M Pusch Department of Palaeoanthropology/Osteology (AC) and *Division of Molecular Genetics (CMP), Institute of Anthropology and Human Genetics, University of Tübingen, D-72074 Tübingen, Germany; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University Hospital Tübingen, Germany (ES) (e-mail:carsten.pusch@uni-tuebingen.de)



1 David AR. Disease in Egyptian mummies: the contribution of new technologies. Lancet 1997; 349: 1760-63. [Text]
2 Bosch X. Look to the bones for clues to human disease. Lancet 2000; 355: 1248.
3 Wolpoff M. Paleoanthropology. 2nd edn. Boston: McGraw-Hill, 1999.
4 Ziegler R. Urmenschenfunde in Baden-Württemberg. Stuttg Beitrg Naturk 1999; C44: 24-39. [PubMed]
5 Weber J, Spring A, Czarnetzki A. Parasagittales Meningeom bei einem 32.500 Jahre alten Schädel aus dem Südwesten von Deutschland: Neue Erkenntnisse über den Umgang mit Krankheit in der Altsteinzeit. Deut Med Wochenschr 2002; 127: 2757-60. [PubMed]
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!