Palanth Forum
May 23, 2012, 03:06:41 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Cave art & handedness: an evolutionary perspective.  (Read 1706 times)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« on: February 03, 2004, 07:39:50 AM »

All,

Here is another interesting bit of information that nearly fell through the New Year's cracks. I'll just note that a somewhat similar study has also been carried out by Dale Guthrie, from Fairbanks, Alaska. Last I heard, the results were to be presented in a soon-to-be published (?) and likely-to-be-controversial book dealing with the significance of cave art.

Jacques Cinq-Mars

Quote
French student looks for lefties among earliest cave painters

By ALEXANDRA WITZE

The Dallas Morning News - Posted on Tue, Dec. 09, 2003


Prehistoric shamans used to mark the transition from the real world to the spirit world, anthropologists think, by blowing pigments around their hands onto cave walls. These ghostly hand prints, which still dot European caves more than 10,000 years later, now serve a less ethereal purpose — telling scientists how many of those shamans were left-handed.

New research shows that the frequency of left-handed painters — 23 percent — is the same today as it was back then.

The work is a rare look at how left-handedness has persisted for millennia, says Charlotte Faurie, the French graduate student who performed the research. It suggests no evolutionary disadvantage to being a lefty, as some scientists had thought.

There’s older evidence that lefties were at work almost as soon as Homo sapiens arose: Wear marks on stone artifacts may signify the presence of southpaws 200,000 years ago. Neanderthals also had their share of lefties; some of their fossilized teeth carry telltale marks that indicate left-handed eating practices, Faurie says.

Such evidence is rare and doesn’t allow scientists to estimate the frequency of left-handedness. That’s why Faurie turned to a database, compiled by Marc Groenen of the Free University of Brussels, of prehistoric hand prints.

In caves stretching across France and Spain, Groenen identified 507 “negative hands,” in which pigment was splattered around a hand by blowing through a tube, spitting, or daubing the paint. Oddly, such negative prints are much more common than positive hand prints in which the palm was painted and pressed against a surface, Groenen says.

By taking careful measurements, Groenen often could identify the age and gender of the person who made the negative hand. In 343 cases, he could determine the handedness of the artist; somebody holding the pigment tube in his or her left hand presumably would have made the imprint of a right hand. Groenen found that 79 prints were of right negative hands, suggesting that 23 percent of the cave artists were left-handed.

Faurie thinks the European caves represent a fair sampling of the number of lefties back then. Some of the hand prints are large and some are small; others are higher or lower on the wall.

“Maybe some hands are from the same artist,” she said. “But we are sure that it is at least many artists.”

She decided to test the cave-painting numbers against the experience of students at her university, France’s University of Montpellier II.

First, she gave students an ink-blowing pen and asked them to outline one hand on a piece of paper taped to a wall. Next, she had them pick up a ball from a table and throw it at a target across the room. Finally, she asked them to identify with which hands they normally wrote.

Just as in the cave paintings, 23 percent of the students held the ink-blowing pens with their left hands and created right negative hands, Faurie and her adviser, Michel Raymond, report in an upcoming issue of Biology Letters.

After that, things become murkier. Only 9 percent of the students wrote with their left hands, and 8 percent threw as lefties.

The findings show how difficult it is to quantify left-handedness, Faurie says. Many people are southpaws for certain tasks but not for others.

Estimates of left-handedness range from 3 percent to 30percent of the population, depending on how and where questions are asked. Studies of tool use show that the northern Inuit people are just 3 percent lefties, while the Yanomami tribe of the Amazon are 23 percent left-handed, Faurie says. About 10percent of Americans write left-handed.

Negative hands appear in caves in other countries, including Australia, South America and Indonesia. Faurie wants to extend her study to those areas, if they have enough well-catalogued hand prints to make the findings statistically significant.

During the Palaeolithic, in caves, humans have painted negative hands by blowing pigments on their own hand through a tube held in the other hand. From these paintings, the proportion of left-handers can be assessed. In an experiment, individuals were observed performing the same task. No difference was detected between the two proportions of left-handers, separated by more than 10,000 years. This study is the first attempt to estimate the long-term temporal evolution of handedness, which is related to the evolution of brain organisation and language. Understanding the coexistence of left- and right-handers remains a puzzle for evolutionary sciences.

The Royal Society is the independent scientific academy of the UK, dedicated to promoting excellence in science

Registered Charity No 207043. Copyright © 2003 The Royal Society. All rights reserved

Logged
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2004, 10:30:43 AM »

All,

Here is another interesting bit of information that nearly fell through the New Year's cracks. I'll just note that a somewhat similar study has also been carried out by Dale Guthrie, from Fairbanks, Alaska. Last I heard, the results were to be presented in a soon-to-be published (?) and likely-to-be-controversial book dealing with the significance of cave art.

Jacques Cinq-Mars

Quoting myself, I just want to bring up the following, recent BBC take on the same story.

Quote
Left-handedness common in Ice Age

By Dr David Whitehouse

BBC News Online science editor --13 February, 2004, 13:54 GMT


The fraction of left-handed people today is about the same as it was during the Ice Age, according to data from prehistoric handprints.

They were found in caves painted during the Upper Palaeolithic period, between 30,000 and 10,000 years ago.

Left-handedness may have conferred prehistoric man advantages, such as in combat, say the researchers.

The research is published in the February issue of the journal Biology Letters.

Evolutionary advantages

When Stone Age man produced their remarkable cave paintings they often left handprints on the walls produced by blowing pigments from one hand through a tube held by the other hand.

Charlotte Faurie and Michel Raymond at the University of Montpellier, France, deduced the prehistoric cave painters' handedness by spraying paint against cave walls to see which hand they pressed against the wall, and therefore did not use for drawing.

Looking at 507 handprints from 26 caves in France and Spain, they deduced that 23% of them were right-handed, which indicated that they were made by left-handers.

In the general population today about 12% are left-handed, though populations vary considerably, between 3 and 30%.

Because handedness has a genetic component the researchers wondered why the proportion of left-handers should have remained so constant over 30,000 years - the age of the oldest cave studied.

They suggest that because left-handedness is relatively rare it provides certain advantages over those who are right-handed, such as in solo and group fighting.

The researchers say their findings add to the evidence that the evolutionary forces that cause right- and left-handedness are independent of culture.

Logged
trehinp
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 289



« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2004, 05:28:27 PM »

Thanks for this Jacques,

I think that the discovery that Lefthandednesss was being as prevalent in the palaeolithic times as it is today, adds to the hypothesis that Homo Sapiens Sapiens were quite similar to us, from a neurological point of view.

This is important to my hypothesis that they must have had similar neurological disabilities as we have today.

I just asked a question to another forum about the various footprints that have been found in some caves, dating from the palaeolithic. The question was to know if any of these were showing "tip toe walking", another neurologically based condition that we observe in contemporary populations, primarily but not only in people with autism. This again would add to the argument of the continuity of homo sapiens sapiens brain structures.  

Yours sincerely.

Paul
Logged

Paul Trehin
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #3 on: February 19, 2004, 03:57:50 AM »

This again would add to the argument of the continuity of homo sapiens sapiens brain structures.  

The neuralogical wiring of hominin brain has followed the same basic structure present in the australopiths, as shown by Professor Holloway's analyses.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
trehinp
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 289



« Reply #4 on: February 19, 2004, 01:14:17 PM »

The neuralogical wiring of hominin brain has followed the same basic structure present in the australopiths, as shown by Professor Holloway's analyses.

Thanks Mikey,

Do you have a link to provide us ? I would love to read that contribution from Professor Holloway.

One additional question is "Would one consider lefthandedness a basic neurological wiring" or the result of a rather complex evolutionary process ?

I think that brain processes such as imitation mechanisms (See Mirror Neurons role in evolution, hundreds of results on a Google research on that search : evolution "Mirror Neurons") went from very basic imitation skills directly triggered by mirror neurons in all primates and progressively imitation skills became more and more free from the model, leading to more adaptive imitation than just aping.

Fascinating debate...

Paul
PS : here is a reference that I didn't read yet, I hesitate because of the price f the book :

"Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language"
Edited by Maxim I. Stamenov and Vittorio Gallese
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences / Universitŕ di Parma
Advances in Consciousness Research 42
2002. viii, 392 pp. (USD 78.95/EUR 66.00)
Logged

Paul Trehin
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #5 on: February 19, 2004, 02:26:58 PM »

Thanks Mikey,

Do you have a link to provide us ? I would love to read that contribution from Professor Holloway.

Off the top of my head there is a 1969 Current Anthropology article and he is authoring the next volume in "The human fossil record" series, which will detail indepth as many of the australopith crania and their neurology as possible. It is due out in early summer - you can probably pre-order through amazon.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!