Palanth Forum
May 23, 2012, 03:14:08 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: A birthday for Clovis "Man".  (Read 1520 times)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« on: February 14, 2004, 07:27:31 AM »

All,

A rather naïve and simplistic piece on the 75th anniversary of the Clovis discovery.

Jacques Cinq-Mars

Quote
Clovis Man turns 75, plus 13,000

By MICHELLE SEEBER

Clovis News Journal -Friday, February 13, 2004


CLOVIS, N.M. — He lived among saber-toothed cats, hunted giant mammoths and bison and was smart enough to dig water wells.

Other than that, even thousands of years later, we still don't know much about the people known collectively as Clovis Man.

Last week marked 75 years since a local amateur archaeologist discovered Clovis Man at Blackwater Draw, about 14 miles southwest of Clovis in eastern New Mexico.

Clovis people lived between 11,500 and 13,000 years ago. Since Clovis Man's discovery, evidence has surfaced that prehistoric man's first North American appearance may have been on the East Coast, but many researchers still favor Clovis Man as the oldest.

In the time of Clovis Man, Columbian mammoths and giant bison roamed the Plains with saber-toothed cats, dire wolves, giant horses, camels, giant ground sloths and big turtles.

"The Columbian mammoth stood almost 14 feet at the shoulder, weighing 8 to 10 tons," said Matt Hillsman, curator of the Blackwater Draw Museum north of Portales. "One mammoth consumed about 700 pounds of vegetation a day."

If Clovis Man hunted these mammoths, many companions may have helped haul the prey home.

Maybe Clovis Man scavenged the mammoths, some have speculated.

"We don't know," Hillsman said. "We don't know specifically what the Clovis Man ate. We don't know what he wore. We don't know what he looked like. We've never found any skeletal evidence of these people, but we know they were here" because they found arrow points made of flint in the skeletal remains of mammoths and bison.

Radiocarbon dating of these arrow points and bones show Clovis Man is certainly the earliest known human occupant of this region, if not in North America.

The earliest recorded finding of the arrow points and mammoth bones was on Feb. 5, 1929, by a 19-year-old man named Ridgley Whiteman.

Whiteman, who died last summer in Clovis, knew the value of his find, said Anthony T. Boldurian, professor of anthropology at the University of Pittsburgh in Greensburg, Pa. He said Whiteman "immersed himself in native lore and became an avid student of Native American legends and myths."

"During summer vacations from grade school (Whiteman and his uncle, T.M. Caldwell) trekked across the Southwest, visiting parks, museums and other educational spots," Boldurian said.

Included in their jaunts were the Colorado Museum of Natural History in Denver, where Whiteman first saw a dinosaur skeleton. They also visited Exposition Park in California, where they saw exquisitely preserved bones and lifelike recreations of Ice Age animals, Boldurian said.

Also, as a teenager, Whiteman mastered the "lost art" of making arrow points, Boldurian said.

Whiteman wrote three letters, the first on Feb. 5, 1929, to the Smithsonian Institution, urging researchers to look at the site where he found mammoth bones, Boldurian said.

Several years later, researchers learned Clovis Man used carved mammoth bone to create shafts attached to arrow points.

They also learned from bones in Blackwater Draw that Clovis Man was surrounded not only by mammoths, but tapirs, four-pronged antelopes, tampulama, llamas, deer, short-faced bears, shovel-toothed amebeledons, beavers, armadillos and peccary.

Scientists believe Clovis Man also created the earliest water control system in the New World. Wells dug by Clovis Man have been found at Blackwater Draw that indicate climate fluctuations and variable water tables in one of the most stable spring-fed lakes of the past.

Layers of sand that can be dated indicate Clovis Man dug these wells.

Hillsman said the Clovis people could have eaten mammoth, but the importance of the find is that "Clovis man is the oldest well-documented evidence of early occupation" in North America.


Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2004, 07:41:26 AM »

All,

A rather naïve and simplistic piece on the 75th anniversary of the Clovis discovery.

Jacques Cinq-Mars

It's a nice summary of when, where and by whom for those who need the "dumbing down" or who are not aware of the discovery history behind the hypothesis.

The comments from Hillman regarding skeletal material and the residue faunal remains from inhabited sites surprises me with their naivety; unless they have been taken out of context.
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2004, 08:49:46 AM »

It's a nice summary of when, where and by whom for those who need the "dumbing down" or who are not aware of the discovery history behind the hypothesis.

The comments from Hillman regarding skeletal material and the residue faunal remains from inhabited sites surprises me with their naivety; unless they have been taken out of context.

I agree, but much of the "dumbing down" and naivety is likely to come from the writer. I think. I hope. What irks me, however, is that she seems to have obtained what little information she passes on from someone (presumably an archaeologist - Hillman) who still adheres to a very conventional version of the so-called "Clovis First" hypothesis. When these people learn about Palaeolithic archaeology?

Jacques Cinq-Nars
Logged
Mikey Brass
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 207



« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2004, 12:48:51 PM »

I agree, but much of the "dumbing down" and naivety is likely to come from the writer. I think. I hope. What irks me, however, is that she seems to have obtained what little information she passes on from someone (presumably an archaeologist - Hillman) who still adheres to a very conventional version of the so-called "Clovis First" hypothesis. When these people learn about Palaeolithic archaeology?

Jacques Cinq-Nars

Indeed the "dumbing down" is from the journalist. How this story reads to me is an assignment being given to a reporter by the editor with the name of someone to contact to provide details which can be used to make the story. From there it was cut down due to the writer's perceptions and word length, before being passed for review to the editor. It is not mentioned what period etc. Hillman specialises in - his word is portrayed as authoritive from the "ivory tower".
Logged

Best, Mikey Brass
Ph.D. student, Institute of Archaeology, UCL
Website: http://www.antiquityofman.com

- !ke e: /xarra //ke
("Diverse people unite": Motto of the South African Coat of Arms, 2002)
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!