Palanth Forum
May 24, 2012, 01:45:55 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Oreopithecus bambolii  (Read 1280 times)
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« on: March 30, 2005, 10:20:28 PM »

Askur (and Paul),

I've changed the topic title  (and maybe should change the board to human paleontology) since you fellows seem curious to know more about Oreopithecus. You can discuss Oreo and its "bipedalism" (remember gibbons also are bipedal on the ground) here as much as you want (but please don't wade into the AAT swamp).


The place where I first head about Oreopithecus bambolii:

http://www.findarticles.com/p/search?qt=Oreopithecus+bambolii&qf=free&tb=art

You can read the primary literature on which the above news articles by Bower (1997, 1999) and Discover (1997) are based at:

CLICK HERE

and

CLICK HERE

as well as a follow-up to the 1997 article at:

CLICK HERE

These are all available full text online (no Adobe Reader required although there are optional icons available to download the pdf free).  I'd be remiss if I failed to mention that the article describing the "hominid-like precision grip capabilty" (Moya-Sola et al. 1999) has been challenged by:

Susman, R.L. (2004). Oreopithecus bambolii: an unlikely case of hominidlike grip capability in a Miocene ape.  Journal of Human Evolution
Volume 46, Issue 1 , January 2004, Pages 105-117
 
Abstract CLICK HERE
"Oreopithecus bambolii, an ape from the late Miocene of Italy, is said to possess a hand capable of a precision grip like that of humans. Relative hand length, proportions of the thumb, and morphological features of the thumb and wrist were adduced to support the idea that Oreopithecus had a hand that closely matched the pattern in Australopithecus. A reappraisal of earlier arguments and comparisons of Oreopithecus with humans, apes, and Old World monkeys, reveals that Oreopithecus had an essentially apelike hand that emphasized apelike power grasping over humanlike precision grasping" (Susman 2004:105).

Oreopithecus is a strange creature, possibly bipedal when foraging short distances on the ground, generally considered a specialized hominoid side-branch, but not considered to be a hominin, nor even a hominid by most experts (regardless of what Marcel Williams says).  

Dar


Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
rmacfarl
Palanth Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 15



« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2005, 02:14:27 AM »

Dar,

(At risk of immediate moderation, for mentioning SAP here... :-)

Jason Eshleman has posted some interesting comments about OB on that unmentionable place - below are some refs he posted in 2000, & some of his own comments from last year, for Askur's & anyone else's benefit.

Something to consider, without getting that "squishy" feeling...

Ross Macfarlane

=========================================

Jason Eshleman   Sep 28 2000, 12:00 am...
"
Rosenberger, A L; Delson, E. The Dentition of Oreopithecus-Bambolii Systematic and Paleobiological Implications.
American Journal of Physical Anthropology, v.66, n.2, (1985): 222-223.


Grine, F E; Krause, D W; Martin, L B. The Ultrastructure of Oreopithecus-Bambolii Tooth Enamel Systematic Implications. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, v.66, n.2, (1985): 177-178.

Ungar, Peter S. Dental microwear of European Miocene catarrhines: Evidence for diets and tooth use. Journal of Human Evolution. 1996. 31(4):335-366.  
[discusses Oreopithecus to some degree]
"

Jason Eshleman   Aug 23 2004, 7:56 pm
news:b7af43cb.0408231856.442f98ef@posting.google.com...

"
While an interesting creature, the teeth of Oreopithecus are very derived while ours are much, much more akin to the ancestral catarrhine condition.  The likelihood of Oreopithecus being in our lineage is incredibly low.  It would require an unprecedented reversal in dental morphology...

It's an interesting creature though and its paleo-environment indicates that it may well have been a "swamp ape" but it's not clear that it got its diet by wading. The teeth show convergence with cercopithecoid bilophodont molars in possessing sheering crests.  It also appears to have been a brachiator-- much moreso than extant African apes.  This evidence points to a creature that moved about in the canopy above the swamps.

Oreopithecus appears to be part of the great diversity of apes of the "muddled middle Miocene" (gotta love that alliteration!) where phylogenetic affinities are blurry.  It was a time when there was an extreme adaptive radiation of apes, but relatively fewer monkeys.  In the plio-pleistocene this seems to have reversed.  It's a puzzle Norm's monkeys replacing apes question wasn't so fantastic, though the
actual mechanism of this replacement in a *variety* of niches (not by any stretch simply swampy forest) are not altogether clear.
"
Logged

Ross Macfarlane
Askur
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 21


« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2005, 05:02:22 PM »

Great.

Who knows what this ape could have evolved into if they were given some more time to evolve?

Once this was the real planet of the apes. Too bad the only way to experience it is through some animated documentary.
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!