Palanth Forum
May 24, 2012, 07:10:08 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: HOMO GEORGICUS, the paper.  (Read 1533 times)
Jacques Cinq-Mars
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1156



« on: December 30, 2005, 08:01:07 AM »

All

Here is the companion/complementary paper to an earlier Dmanissi (aka Dmanisi) product that was mentioned earlier, HERE.

Addition: this de Lumley & Lordkipanize paper should also have been linked to the one brought up earlier by "shenzhou" (HERE).

Quote
de Lumley, Marie-Antoinette and David Lordkipanidze. 2006. L’Homme de Dmanissi(Homo georgicus), il y a 1 810 000 ans. C R Palevol 5 (in press)

Abstract:

Dmanissi Man ([Homo georgicus), 1 810 000 years ago. Excavations carried out since 1991 at the open-air site of Dmanissi, Georgia, have yielded four craniums, three mandibles, about 15 postcranial remains and a dozen isolated teeth. These remains correspond to at least four individuals, two adults and two adolescents. They were excavated from a precise stratigraphic, palaeontological and archaeological context above a basalt flow dated by K/Ar between 1.8 and 1.9 ± 0.01 Ma in a volcanic ash layer dated by 40Ar/39Ar to 1.80 ± 0.05 Ma. The interest of these discoveries is fourfold: – (1) the dates obtained by diverse radiochronometric methods and by palaeomagnetism demonstrate, for the first time, that Man was present at the gates of Europe, in Transcaucasia at a much earlier period than that established by the classical scenario; – (2) faunal and pollens analyses have revealed that the environment was close to a savannah type, but much richer in water resources than the African environment. It was a temperate climate, with a mosaic of different landscapes due to the geomorphological diversity of the region, made up of valleys, lakes and the nearby mountains of the Great and Small Caucasus; – (3) the settlement of this human group could have been a direct consequence of a more humid environment, which followed a generalised aridification of the East of Georgia at the end of the Pliocene and which attracted fauna from both the East of the Eurasian continent and the North of the African continent; – (4) the morphofunctional aspects of these humans are close to those of Homo habilis and to those of the most archaic Homo erectus, which were the only species known in Africa up until now. Ascribed to a new species, Homo georgicus, small in size measuring 1.5 m with a cranial capacity of 600 to 700 cm3 (half of modern man’s capacity), they represent the ancestors of a long European or Eurasian lineage. Two new concepts can be retained: – the exodus from Africa took place earlier than previously thought, dating back to at least 1.8 Myr ago. It was carried out by Homo georgicus, a group close to Homo habilis; – it is no longer valid to base explanations of Man’s migratory capacity in terms of cranial development. Homo georgicus, with a small brain volume, already had the faculty to adapt to a more favourable environment for his survival.

Keywords: Homo georgicus; Dmanissi; Transcaucasia; Preoldowayan; Lower Pleistocene; Cranial development

Click HERE for access to the article.

I may be out of the loop here, but I have yet to read critical reviews/comments regarding the lofty claims emanating from Dmanisi.

Jacques Cinq-Mars
Logged
shenzhou
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 41


« Reply #1 on: January 05, 2006, 10:53:18 AM »


I may be out of the loop here, but I have yet to read critical reviews/comments regarding the lofty claims emanating from Dmanisi.


It's an interesting question why some discoveries generate more controvery than others. It does seem unusual that there have not been more criticisms especially as paleoanthropology frequently seems to generate an awful lot of heated debate.

On the subject of Dmanisi/Dmanissi I recently came across an article describing the 3D scanning and reconstruction of D2282 HERE (in french)
Logged
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« Reply #2 on: January 05, 2006, 12:45:51 PM »


I may be out of the loop here, but I have yet to read critical reviews/comments regarding the lofty claims emanating from Dmanisi.


It's an interesting question why some discoveries generate more controvery than others. It does seem unusual that there have not been more criticisms especially as paleoanthropology frequently seems to generate an awful lot of heated debate.

On the subject of Dmanisi/Dmanissi I recently came across an article describing the 3D scanning and reconstruction of D2282 here (in french)

Shenzhou,

With regard to the 3D scanning and reconstruction URL you entered in the above paragraph, in order to make  obvious the place to 'click' to reach this, I 've made your  "here"  bold by modifying your quote with inserted  bracketed "b" and "/b"  and capitalized "here" to make it "HERE".  This makes the paragraph read as follows:

On the subject of Dmanisi/Dmanissi I recently came across an article describing the 3D scanning and reconstruction of D2282 HERE (in french)

Much easier to recognize where to 'click'.   The instructions for posting in this manner are located within  "Help",  for which the icon is found near the top of the forum page.  Specifically, the different  options can be found at:

http://forum.palanth.com/index.php?action=help;page=post
or CLICK HERE

Under the heading (about 1/3 of the page down) "Standard Posting Options". 

I appreciate your post pointing to the D2282 reconstruction, and I'm only trying to help others find it.  When I read your post, my initial thought was "where?".  Making it bold makes "where" obvious.

Best regards,
Dar
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
shenzhou
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 41


« Reply #3 on: January 05, 2006, 01:12:43 PM »

With regard to the 3D scanning and reconstruction URL you entered in the above paragraph, in order to make  obvious the place to 'click' to reach this, I 've made your  "here"  bold by modifying your quote with inserted  bracketed "b" and "/b"  and capitalized "here" to make it "HERE".  This makes the paragraph read as follows:

you're right, thanks for the tip :)
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!