Palanth Forum
May 24, 2012, 08:22:06 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: New Neanderthal mtDNA  (Read 1615 times)
shenzhou
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 41


« on: June 05, 2006, 03:26:01 PM »

In the June 1st issue of Current biology there is a report of a new Neanderthal Mitochondrial DNA sequence:

Revisiting Neandertal diversity with a 100,000 year old mtDNA sequence
Ludovic Orlando, Pierre Darlu, Michel Toussaint, Dominique Bonjean, Marcel Otte, and Catherine Hänni

http://www.current-biology.com/content/issue?volume=16&issue=11

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2006.05.019 (not working yet)

There isn't an abstract so here are some quotes:

"Recently, sequences of the hypervariable region-1 (HVR-1) of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) from 9 Neandertal specimens dated between 29,000 and 42,000 years ago from dispersed locations have revealed the genetic diversity of Neandertals around the time of the cohabitation [1–4]. The genetic signatures before and after contact with modern humans were found to be similar. They fall outside the range of modern human genetic diversity and show no specific affinity with modern or Paleolithic Europeans [5].

...........................

We, therefore, retrieved 123 bp of the mtDNA HVR-1 from a 100,000 year old Neandertal tooth from the Scladina cave (Meuse Basin, Belgium), which represents the most ancient Neandertal sample analyzed at the DNA level.

..............................

The Scladina Neandertal sequence has not been found among the 7161 human HVR- I sequences present in the HvrBase++ [16]. It appears more distantly related to the human than to the already reported Neandertal sequences

.............................

When chimpanzee sequences are used as outgroups, the Neandertals appear as monophyletic (bootstrap support 72.3%). When chimpanzee sequences are excluded, the Scladina sequence still clusters with other Neandertal sequences (bootstrap-support 96.5%), excluding all human mtDNA lineages.

..............................

While the diversity of the more recent Neandertals is similar to that of modern humans worldwide, the sequence from Scladina reveals that more divergent Neandertal haplotypes existed before 42,000 years ago. This could suggest that Neandertals experienced genetic drift as demographic bottlenecks eliminated the phylogenetically more recent (i.e. less expanded) haplotypes from populations. Consequently, the most likely conserved Neandertal haplotypes could also be the phylogenetically most ancient (i.e. the most closely related to the common ancestor of modern humans and Neandertals).

...............

the Scladina sequence has revealed that the genetic diversity of Neandertals has been underestimated. Thus, more Neandertal sequences than the six presently available and longer than 100 bp are needed to fully understand the extent of the past diversity of Neandertals."
Logged
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« Reply #1 on: June 05, 2006, 03:34:49 PM »

Thanks for the quotes from Current Biology.  The EurekaAlert press release, shamelessly stolen from postings by Anne Gilbert, can be read: CLICK HERE.
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
lagarvelho
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 354



« Reply #2 on: June 05, 2006, 11:40:36 PM »

Dar:

You're welcome to "shamelessly steal" quotes from the EurekAlert piece, because I get this kind of material from EurekAlert and other publications through RSS feeds which I then pass around to various interested parties.  I didn't post it here because I wasn't quite sure how to post directly to palanth.com from my personal "feed".  Anyway, I also have a PDF of the original article, which was very brief, should anyone wish to get it. 
Anne G
Logged
lagarvelho
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 354



« Reply #3 on: June 05, 2006, 11:50:12 PM »

All:

In case anybody is interested, John Hawks has something to say on the subject of the newest round of Neandertal gene sequencing. 

You read his thoughts at this URL:

http://johnhawks.net/weblog/reviews/neandertals/neandertal_dna/orlando_2006_scladina_dna.html

Happy reading,
Anne G
Logged
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« Reply #4 on: June 06, 2006, 12:06:55 AM »

Dar:
I didn't post it here because I wasn't quite sure how to post directly to palanth.com from my personal "feed".
Anne G

Probably best not to try posting here from your RSS feed.  I don't think RSS feeds are smart enough to "select" the appropriate forum board, much less thread (if the subject has already been introduced). 

Dar
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
lagarvelho
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 354



« Reply #5 on: June 06, 2006, 02:30:23 PM »

Dar:

Oh duh.  Hadn't thought of the "selection" angle.  But since I can "cut and paste" anything I find that might be of interest, I'll do that instead, if I find anything of interest.
Anne G
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!