Palanth Forum
May 24, 2012, 08:42:59 AM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register  
Pages: 1
  Print  
Author Topic: Homo floresiensis or pygmoid Homo sapiens?  (Read 922 times)
Daryl Habel
Moderator
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472



« on: August 24, 2006, 10:17:17 AM »

In the latest round of what Time magazine has labled the "Hobbit wars", Professor Teuku Jacob and collaborators have published this week in PNAS the results of their examination of the Lia Buang Homo floresiensis fossils and have proposed that the key specimen LB1, the small-brained skull and holotype of the species H. floresiensis is drawn from an earlier pygmy H. sapiens population, but individually shows signs of a development abnormality, including microcephaly, and that the additional postcranial remains from Lia Buang share small body size but not microcephaly.  

The PNAS article is:
Quote
Published online before print August 23, 2006
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 10.1073/pnas.0605563103
OPEN ACCESS ARTICLE

Pygmoid Australomelanesian Homo sapiens skeletal remains from Liang Bua, Flores: Population affinities and pathological abnormalities

T. Jacob *, E. Indriati *, R. P. Soejono , K. Hsü , D. W. Frayer ¶, R. B. Eckhardt ||, A. J. Kuperavage ||, A. Thorne **, and M. Henneberg
 

*Laboratory of Bioanthropology and Paleoanthropology, Gadjah Mada University Faculty of Medicine, Yogyakarta 55281, Indonesia; National Archaeological Research Center, J1. Raya Condet Pejaten No. 4, Jakarta 12001, Indonesia; Kenneth Hsü Center for Integrated Hydrologic Circuits Development, National Institute of Earth Sciences, Beijing 100101, China; ¶Department of Anthropology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045; ||Laboratory for the Comparative Study of Morphology, Mechanics, and Molecules, Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802; **Archaeology and Natural History, Research School of Pacific and Asian Studies, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200 Australia; and Anatomical Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia

Contributed by K. Hsü, July 7, 2006

Liang Bua 1 (LB1) exhibits marked craniofacial and postcranial asymmetries and other indicators of abnormal growth and development. Anomalies aside, 140 cranial features place LB1 within modern human ranges of variation, resembling Australomelanesian populations. Mandibular and dental features of LB1 and LB6/1 either show no substantial deviation from modern Homo sapiens or share features (receding chins and rotated premolars) with Rampasasa pygmies now living near Liang Bua Cave. We propose that LB1 is drawn from an earlier pygmy H. sapiens population but individually shows signs of a developmental abnormality, including microcephaly. Additional mandibular and postcranial remains from the site share small body size but not microcephaly.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Author contributions: T.J., E.I., D.W.F., R.B.E., A.T., and M.H. designed research; T.J., E.I., R.P.S., K.H., D.W.F., R.B.E., A.J.K., A.T., and M.H. performed research; R.B.E. contributed new reagents/analytic tools; T.J., E.I., R.P.S., K.H., D.W.F., R.B.E., A.J.K., A.T., and M.H. analyzed data; and T.J., E.I., R.P.S., K.H., D.W.F., R.B.E., A.T., and M.H. wrote the paper.

Conflict of interest statement: No conflicts declared.

Freely available online through the PNAS open access option.

To whom correspondence may be addressed.

K. Hsü, E-mail: kenjhsu@aol.com
R. B. Eckhardt, E-mail: eyl@psu.edu

Please note that PNAS has published this as an "open access" article, which means it is free to everyone without subscription, available (via icon for a pdf) from the abstract page, at: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/abstract/0605563103v1?etoc

Kris Hirst has written an informative article, which includes an interview with one of the PNAS authors (Robert Eckhardt) and a rebuttal (by Russell Ciochon), with links to several news stories at the end, at archaeology.about.com:
http://archaeology.about.com/od/floresman/a/flores3.htm

And always worth reading, John Hawks has posted his weblog take on the story at:
http://johnhawks.net/weblog/fossils/flores/jacob_2006_pathology.html

But it's safe to say, no one believes this is the final word on this controversy.

Dar
Logged

Daryl Habel
Editorial Advisory Committee
PALANTH
lagarvelho
Palanth Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 354



« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2006, 05:22:52 PM »

Dar and all:

About all I can say at this point is, these "hobbit wars" are just getting beyond ridiculous.  I have the "hobbit" paper, printed out and ready to read, but even after I've read it and satisfied myself as to its contents, I doubt seriously that this is going to be the end of the wars.  Or anything like it.
Anne G
Logged
Pages: 1
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.5 | SMF © 2006-2008, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!